Special Report: Learning In The Digital Age
Scientific American (August 2013), 309, 69-71
Published online: 17 July 2013 | doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0813-69
Published online: 17 July 2013 | doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0813-69
The Future Of Testing
Why We Need High-Speed Schools
Arne Duncan
Abstract
Greater broadband access will bring the latest digital tools to more teachers and students
Introduction
CREDIT: KYLE BEAN (illustration); MITCH PAYNE (photograph)
Recently I had the opportunity to visit the future. It was located in Kristie Ford's classroom in Detroit.
On
the day I was invited, the class of fifth and sixth graders was a hive
of activity and motion, which Ford did not need to closely direct.
Instead as she talked individually with a few students, others worked
independently in small clusters discussing their study of the solar
system or sprawled on the floor constructing 3-D models. Still others
were enmeshed in learning games and apps on laptops.
But
as Ford and others at the Brenda Scott Academy for Theatre Arts made
clear, the bustle was about more than fun and engaging tasks and cool
technology. Underlying that surface appearance was a plan—backed by
digital technology—to tailor learning to each student's needs.
In
traditional classrooms, students complete a lesson and move on to the
next when it is time for the whole class to do so—regardless of whether
they have mastered it or they are already well ahead. Here each student
worked at her or his own pace, taking as much or little time as
necessary to complete one lesson and then moving on to the next. Each
child worked from an individual learning plan, and Ford could offer
students material from a wide variety of digital sources—including
traditional publishers, freely available “open” educational resources
and her own original material.
The digital revolution
has changed nearly every aspect of daily life—from how Americans shop,
to how they communicate, to how they find a date. Schools—many of which
have been slow to embrace innovation—are beginning to let in this
digital revolution. For the students in Ford's class, the benefits are
clear. Yet what is happening at her school is not the norm, and the
danger is that digital-learning tools could miss their potential to
close long-standing learning gaps and instead disproportionately benefit
students who already have the most advantages. That is why the Obama
administration has taken steps to ensure access and equity in digital
learning: with funding for innovations that tailor learning to students'
needs; with funding for new assessments that are part of a state-led
effort to raise learning standards; and with a major five-year challenge
from the president to give virtually every student access to broadband
and wireless Internet. But it will take everyone—educators, technology
developers, systems leaders—working together to make sure that students
everywhere enjoy the opportunities that Ford's students do.
Top of page
Technology and Change
Today's
elementary school students will be completing college around 2030. Their
careers will take them deep into the second half of the 21st century.
It is a good bet that the economy they enter will rely even more on
knowledge and technology than ours does today. Our schools must prepare
students for that future, and we had better get it right. Their
preparedness will decide our economic strength as a country.
Digital
technology will play an important part in ensuring they are ready. For
students and teachers alike, it will make the walls of school porous as
never before. Teachers can connect with one another virtually, not just
to share lesson plans but also to mentor and share strategies for
effective teaching through online collaboration. Via Web-enabled
communication and streaming video, students—particularly those who are
geographically isolated or who are taking advanced courses with limited
enrollment—can connect with experts who might be thousands of miles away
and can use nearly limitless instructional resources.
Meanwhile
developers are creating mobile learning apps that are useful almost
everywhere. Many popular educational apps are co-designed by teachers
and software developers. Technology is also making it possible to blend
online and face-to-face learning, which enables teachers to group
students flexibly and offers educators rich data on students' progress.
Furthermore,
sites such as Khan Academy have brought on-demand explanations of
concepts—ranging from addition and subtraction to quasars and galactic
collisions—to students' mobile devices. And increasingly, students are
accessing virtual simulations that allow them, for example, to take a
virtual “walk” through an organic molecule as if it were a building.
The
pace at which students are adopting new technologies is extraordinary. A
third of the nation's high school students pursue online courses, and
millions of people are enrolled in Web-based college classes.
This
is exciting stuff, although I do not believe that any single technology
will reinvent schooling. Further, I emphatically do not believe that
technology ever can replace teachers in any way. The vital human
connection between educator and learner will always be the crucial spark
in education. Technology, however, can enhance that spark by helping
teachers to use their time and talents more effectively and to
personalize the learning experience to the needs and interests of
individual students.
Top of page
Personalized Learning Through Technology
Among
the most important directions for technology—and one that the U.S.
Department of Education is working to accelerate—is supporting the
efforts of teachers to tailor learning to the needs of each student. One
of the most enduring, and valid, criticisms of our education system is
that it has taken a one-size-fits-all approach to our kids in the face
of their unique combinations of gifts and challenges. Personalizing
learning is the idea that the pace, approach and context of the learning
experience should be tailored to the needs and interests of
individuals. It is easy (and common) to tell a teacher to adapt a lesson
to the needs of each child, but hard to do it. Technology can help. By
blending face-to-face and online learning, teachers can enable students
to work at their own pace, be flexible in grouping students according to
ability, and get a dynamic stream of information about where students
are doing well and where they are struggling.
The
Department of Education is taking active steps to support states and
school systems that are working to become models for personalized
learning. With support from a fund called the Race to the Top–District
competition, 55 school districts across 11 states and the District of
Columbia are demonstrating how they use technology to personalize
education and provide school leaders and teachers with innovative tools.
Top of page
Using Technology to Improve Assessment
Other
federal initiatives aim to bring technological innovation to everyone's
least favorite part of school: testing. Over the next few years
students will see the tests they take at the end of the year move
online, if they have not already, and the tests will, frankly, get
better. It is vitally important to assess students' learning every year.
Without that feedback, schools can fail to identify and help the most
vulnerable students. Improved tests will also be critical for supporting
the recent efforts by nearly every state to establish new and higher
academic standards, including the Common Core standards initiative. The
federal government is supporting that state-led effort by providing more
than $350 million to two consortia of states that are creating tests to measure student mastery of those standards.
These
new assessments will test students' ability to read complex texts and
solve real-world problems. They will also provide a better measure of
whether students are on track to graduate from high school with the
knowledge and skills to succeed in college and the workforce.
One
consortium is developing an adaptive test—meaning that the difficulty
of questions will change during the course of the exam, based on student
answers. This type of assessment has the potential to allow for a more
precise understanding of student skills.
Over the next few years students will see the tests they take at the end of the year move online, if they haven't already, and the tests will, frankly, get better. These tests will ask students to develop products or experiments; test hypotheses; analyze data; and support, justify and explain their reasoning.
Yet
these new assessments will require major improvements. Over the coming
years everyone interested in changing education will need to push
further to find ways to design even better assessments. These tests will
ask students to develop products or experiments; test hypotheses;
analyze data; and support, justify and explain their reasoning. And over
time we will see students work within real-world scenarios to solve
problems with assessments that function almost like flight simulators.
These tests will examine if students understand content and better gauge
whether they can demonstrate critical thinking and apply learning.
Indeed,
we are seeing other improvements in testing. This past May, for
example, the Advanced Placement (AP) biology exam was updated to improve
how it assesses students' critical thinking about scientific issues.
The number of multiple-choice questions has been reduced by nearly half,
and the number of open-ended questions—requiring students to construct a
thoughtful written response—has doubled. In the next two years we will
see AP upgrades for chemistry and physics as well.
Top of page
Breaking the Dam: Access to Broadband
What
all these innovations in teaching and testing share is a dependence on
technology—particularly, reliable, high-speed Internet connections. Yet
today fewer than 20 percent of educators say their school's Internet
connection meets their teaching needs. In addition, although 91 percent
of teachers have access to computers in their classrooms, less than a
quarter say they have the right level of technology. Moreover, our
teachers do not get enough training and support to integrate technology
in their classroom and lessons.
Too often it is
schools in low-income and rural communities that are on the wrong end of
that connectivity gap. The divide grows even more pronounced when
students leave school and go home. Alarmingly, a 2012 report from the
Federal Communications Commission reveals that 19 million
Americans—especially those in rural areas—do not have access to
broadband in their communities at all.
That is why I
am so excited about the president's call in June for a five-year effort
that will provide high-speed broadband and wireless to 99 percent of
students. The ConnectED initiative also aims to improve the skills of
teachers, providing every educator in America with support and training
to integrate technology into classroom lessons.
The
federal government has had a role in bridging the digital divide and
ensuring that all students have access to the Internet since 1996,
through the fcc's E-Rate program. E-Rate has enabled the percentage of
classrooms with Internet connections to increase to more than 95
percent, from 14 percent when it began.
Yet bandwidth
has not kept pace with the rapidly increasing demand for classroom
technology or high-tech applications that require faster, more reliable
Internet connections. Currently far too many schools and districts
struggle with slow Internet speeds, inadequate wiring and a lack of
hardware. Indeed, the typical school has a slower Internet connection
than the typical house in America; a school wired in the early years of
E-Rate could be overwhelmed by students in just one classroom trying to
stream video. Broadband Internet is the interstate highway for
knowledge; ConnectED will build the on-ramps our schools and educators
need.
Educators can help right now. Every school and
district should take stock of its actual bandwidth capability by using
simple tools to test and monitor Internet connection speeds, such as the
one provided by SchoolSpeedTest.org. Gathering and submitting this
information will clarify our collective understanding of schools'
bandwidth needs and provide better data to help districts and states
expand capacity.
The deficit of high-speed
connectivity is a challenge we must meet. The upside to investing in
quality digital infrastructure in schools is huge.
Expanding
broadband in every school will mean that students will benefit from
higher standards and the assessments that go with them, along with a new
generation of learning technologies—without barriers of wealth and
geography.
Top of page
Bridging a New Digital Divide
Bandwidth
is only the first challenge we must face in making technology a tool
for equity. We also must commit, together, to make new technologies a
force that lifts all students. It is no secret that affluent families
will use their wealth to put the best learning tools in their kids'
hands. And studies have demonstrated that parents in more affluent
communities tend to more closely supervise their children's technology
use—resulting in greater learning. The troubling possibility is that the
digital-learning revolution could thus simply widen the opportunity gap
between students who attend poorer and wealthier schools. For
technology with such exciting, barrier-breaking possibilities, that
would be a tragedy.
It is up to schools, districts,
parents and technologists to figure out how to balance this equation—to
make sure that teachers, especially in low-income communities, have
access to cutting-edge technology and good guidance about how to choose
tools that will work well for their students.
Classrooms such as Kristie Ford's in Detroit have demonstrated what is possible. It is up to the rest of us to learn from her.
Source: http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v309/n2/full/scientificamerican0813-69.html
Over
the next few years students will see the tests they take at the end of
the year move online, if they haven't already, and the tests will,
frankly, get better. These tests will ask students to develop products
or experiments; test hypotheses; analyze data; and support, justify and
explain their reasoning.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario